The Whole-of-Government Hosting Strategy launched final week is a miles more vast document than its narrow 17 pages suggests.

Indeed, it appears to flag a few huge shifts in thinking about the virtual transformation agenda.

In numerous respects, the Hosting Strategy charts a route pretty one of a kind from the United Kingdom imaginative and prescient of the early 2000s, which heavily stimulated former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.

The UK’s Government Digital Service pushed a slim definition of ‘cloud’ inside authorities, and regarded with suspicion measures to mandate safety standards, claiming they have been used as an excuse by using groups to keep away from alternate.


While the UK has quietly walked again from this position on safety recently, there’s no doubt the GDS rhetoric changed into exceedingly influential in Australia on the birth of our Digital Transformation Office and, now, Agency.

The Hosting Strategy, but, gives a extra nuanced picture of the destiny architecture of Federal Government ICT, and one that appears extra regular with the hybrid IT version that has emerged inside the company region.

As the hype cycle approximately public cloud has flattened out in latest years, the personal sector has become a whole lot clearer approximately what works, what doesn’t paintings and what is a realistic and fee-effective model of organizing ICT belongings.

In brief, it’s far a combination of the public and personal cloud, hosted property and even some retained legacy in-house IT infrastructure.

The Hosting Strategy implies a similar photo for the Federal Government. It charges Gartner studies predicting government spending growth of 17 percentage a yr to 2021 on public cloud, however, sees this outstripped with the aid of private cloud spending growing at twice the pace.

At one level, that is certainly a recognition of reality.

But it also speaks to a growing sophistication in government about a way to almost piece collectively the antique and the brand new in methods that meet the particular desires of presidency.

Chief amongst those wishes is protection. The method explicitly elevates the importance of constructing public believe in how the government handles citizens’ data, and the high standards the community expects governments to apply.

The strategy notes that even records deemed “Unclassified” for security functions “may additionally turn out to be touchy because of changed community expectancies or because of statistics aggregation”. That is, relying on where it sits and who can see it.

This questioning underpins the proposed new machine of classifying records centers.

Those proposed classifications emphasize the significance of defensive sovereignty over Australians’ facts through setting conditions on ownership and control and/or requiring compensation bills if the Government chooses to move facts while manipulating adjustments.

This is some other place where there was a quiet revolution.

Only a few years ago, the idea that there was a case for maintaining statistics onshore and underneath the manage of Australians turned into brushed off with the aid of many as terribly old school.

Governments and groups around the world were stung via unforeseen effects of taking a too relaxed mindset to the problem.

There has been a rising problem, led by Australian and US governments, about networking and facts garage infrastructure sourced from international locations that do not proportion our democratic values.
There has been the acquisition of manage of statistics centers storing touchy Australian authorities records by using Chinese traders.
There have been nasty shocks suffered by authorities and business exposing the unappreciated risks of opaque deliver chains, including the worldwide Operation Cloudhopper, attacks concentrated on of controlled provider carriers to get admission to the data of their clients.
Europe moved to shield the records of people through the General Data Protection Regulation, and in a few instances, extended the rights of European citizens to records held out of doors the EU.
And there was the backlash in opposition to the MyHealth record, which noticed hundreds of thousands of Australians show a lack of belief and self-assurance inside the capacity of the Government to maintain their non-public facts safe.
There have even been remarks from Microsoft that its clients are not cozy sending their data to Australia due to provisions of the Assistance and Access Act to allow law enforcement groups get admission to information inside the direction of investigations.

These comments verify a growing consciousness of the attain and sensitivity to countrywide legal guidelines even among folks that inside the recent beyond dismissed these concerns.

Understandably, the website hosting approach did no longer get good deal attention in advance of the finances and expected to fire of the election marketing campaign beginning gun. It is to be was hoping dialogue resurfaces when the election season is over.

Check Also

Design and other areas where startups can save money

For small and startup businesses, every cent really does count and making sure that you ta…